Andy Murray - Still Room for Improvement at Grand Slam Level
Andy Murray lost the final of the 2013 Australian Open in
4 sets to Novak Djokovic
Murray started strongly taking the first set on a tiebreak and had three
breakpoints at the start of the 2nd set but was unable to convert them. After that, Djokovic started to find his
rhythm on his groundstrokes and serves and took the 2nd set to a
tiebreak, which he won to square the match.
I got the distinct feeling that it was going to be
difficult for Murray to regain the momentum, taking into consideration he
played Roger Federer in a tough 4 hour battle two nights before. That turned out to be the case as Murray was
broken at 4-3 in the 3rd set, leaving Djokovic to serve it out. The 4th set
proved to be a procession for Djokovic, breaking Murray twice who by now was
spent physically and emotionally, Djokovic taking it 6-2 to win his 4th
Australian Open and 3rd in a row.
The interesting thing was that the pundits were prepared
to say that Murray is still a league behind Djokovic at Grand Slam level. That is an interesting statement, considering
Murray beat Djokovic in 5 sets in the US Open just a few months ago. On that occasion, the pressure was on Murray
to deliver but now the pressure was on Djokovic, and he came through after a
nervous beginning.
In Murray’s previous match, the statistics looked good. Murray
hit 62 winners and served 25 aces (check), in fact Murray hit almost 20 more
winners than Federer which is unusual, and out aced Federer by 20. However, winning a major tournament involves
repeating that kind of performance back to back from the quarterfinal onwards, Murray
came up short when it came to imposing his game For instance, in the final,
Murray came to net only 15 times in 4 sets, whereas Djokovic came to net 41
times. Clearly Djokovic was prepared to
take more chances in coming forward to force the action.
As far as where Murray goes from here, he can be satisfied
in having played another good tournament where he was only stopped by the
number 1 player in the world. There is
no need to panic or fret, or feel he is not going to get where he wants to go
as a tennis player and multiple grand slam winner. However, for Murray to achieve these goals,
this match showed that there are still some things that need to be improved
technically and tactically before he can achieve the dream of being a multiple
major winner.
For Murray to realise his potential even further, he has
to play consistently aggressive all year round and not just at certain times or
certain matches in tournaments. That is
a habit to play consistently aggressive and something Ivan Lendl can work on
with Murray as part of the next stage of his development.
Murray still has to be bolder in his shot selection and
be prepared to go near the lines more often in the very big matches. During the Australian final, Murray played
many rallies which were long, but appeared to have no real strategy; he was
either waiting for a mistake or trying to engineer an opening which never
materialised, in many instances losing the point and heightening his
frustration.
I notice that Murray has yet to recognise consistently
that when he hits a big shot into the corners and his opponent is on the
defensive, he doesn’t follow in to net, which lets his opponent back in the
rally, that happened on many occasions on Sunday. This is one strategy / tactic Murray must
work on to improve, his volleys are very good and he needs to utilise them
more. Murray should also consider the
hit and charge tactic on the 2nd serve from time to time to keep his opponent
guessing especially on key points. This
is a tactic Federer has successfully employed against Murray in major tournaments;
it shortens big points and saves energy.
There is no reason for Murray to get disheartened by his
latest slam loss. He has come a very
long way in a short space of time and is rightly considered one of the best
players in the world. However, if Murray
wants to become the very best and win Wimbledon, he still has to improve the
finer points of aggressive tennis and play over 90% of his points with much
more purpose than he displayed in the Australian Open final.
Murray is a learner so it will be interesting to see if he
keeps improving to become a multi slam champion and world number 1 in 2013.
Comments
Post a Comment