Tim Henman's Sampras dilemma
Recently ex tennis player Tim Henman gave his views on what has been the never-ending Roger Federer Pete Sampras debate. Now this has been done to death since 2004 in the media and on tennis forums long before Federer broke Sampras’ records and long since Federer broke Sampras’ records . What surprised me was that Henman, a guy who played both was so willing to give an opinion on an otherwise worn argument. Henman was in Kolkata India as an ambassador for the HSBC road to Wimbledon tournament. And he was asked the question: Having played against both Pete Sampras and Roger Federer , who would you pick as the better player? This was Henman’s answer: Yeah, I played Pete when he was world No. 1. He was an incredible player, that's why he won 14 Grand Slams. When he served well, he was at the top of his game. But Roger has a better all-round game and plays at a high level all the time. He has a great firs...